Let’s look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to something that shares idc’s server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type has the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it doesn’t have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it’s a company.
It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company’s homepage in addition to the Webhard’s original function, the thought of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.
The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, that may be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.
It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files on the internet at a set monthly cost. Which means that the use of web hard is becoming common.
But it’s not just recently that this concept came out, and it’s true that it’s been a long time. The moment it came out, many people used it, and there were many office workers who didn’t join it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company refuses to adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users’ needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It’s a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word “basic” implies, it isn’t a webhard solution developed at a high cost. As a result, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it’s a very low-cost, very useful solution that’s significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I’ll take a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one in line with the reality and needs.