Let’s consider the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to something that shares idc’s server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so it does not have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.
However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn’t just a Webhard, it is a company.
It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business’s homepage in addition to the Webhard’s original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.
The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, which is often fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.
It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files online at a set monthly cost. 웹하드사이트 Therefore using web hard has become common.
But it’s not just recently that this concept came out, and it’s true that it’s been a long time. The moment it came out, many people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn’t sign up for it or even paid for their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users’ needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It’s a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without having to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word “basic” implies, it’s not a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it’s a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that’s less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I’ll take a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one in line with the reality and needs.